Gothamist77%

Lawmakers rally to save Jimmy's Corner as beloved Midtown dive bar faces eviction 0%

By Rhiannon Rashidi0%

4/10/2026, 1:48:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 893 faulty-reasoning hits from 588 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

A group of lawmakers rallied Friday to stop the eviction of Jimmy’s Corner, the last remaining dive bar near Times Square. 
Jimmy's has been serving beers and shots since 1971, when the Crossroads of the World was a notorious epicenter of porn shops and skullduggery. 
The bar's founder, Jimmy Glenn, died of COVID-19 in 2020, and his son Adam Glenn has since taken over. 
The landlord, the Durst Organization, wants to sell the building, and argues in court documents it could terminate the bar’s lease upon the founder’s death. 
The younger Glenn filed a lawsuit in December in an attempt to halt the eviction, arguing the bar’s lease doesn’t expire until 2029. 
Now, some elected officials say the bar is a symbol of small businesses being priced out by landlords. 
State Sen. 
Julia Salazar and Assemblymember Emily Gallagher said during Friday’s rally that the pending eviction was a reason to pass their proposed Small Business Rent Stabilization Act, which would limit rent hikes and guarantee lease renewals for businesses that don’t owe back rent. 
“While we are here rallying to save Jimmy's, this problem is bigger than a single bar. 
This is about the fact that small businesses are being squeezed out of our city,” Salazar said. 
“While there was a lot of focus on doing this at the city level  it's time for us to act through state law to get it done.” 
Jimmy's Corner owner Adam Glenn spoke at a rally for legislation that would create rent control for small businesses. 
Glenn said the legislation wouldn't save the bar because he's not being priced out by rent, but argued it would “help protect the next Jimmy's Corner, the next business that builds themselves up, that puts themselves in a position to provide their family a better life.” 
Jimmy’s Corner sticks out compared to its neighbors. 
In an area filled with high-priced tourist traps, most of the drinks at the bar cost less than $5 and its walls are adorned with boxing memorabilia. 
Regulars say the bar is special because it attracts people from all walks of life. 
”One night I was here, there were people just coming in dressed like they were going to the Tony's, and it was a couple of construction workers that were right next to them,” said Melvin Jones who has been visiting the bar for almost 30 years. 
Durst Organization spokesperson Jovana Rizzo wrote in a statement that the company let the bar stay for years while paying just $5,000 in base rent “due to the personal relationship with Jimmy.” 
“We have done our best to be good neighbors, and we regret it has come to this,” Rizzo added. 
The company wants to sell the lot to a housing developer. 
“This place is a community staple. 
It's an important part of New York City. 
It's what makes it vibrant and alive,” said Dan Holton-Roth, a lawyer and friend of one of Jimmy’s Corner’s longterm bartenders. 
“We don't need more luxury condos. 
There's plenty of those in the city.” 
Glenn said that if the beloved bar gets evicted, he will find it a new location. 
"I don't know if we're going win, but what I do know is we're winning today. 
They wanted us out in November and we're still here," he said. 
“I've told everyone: No matter how this fight goes I'll fight it till the bitter end. 
There'll always be a Jimmy's corner in New York.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 3.1%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias4.3%This article: 18.4%Rhiannon Rashidi: 8.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect18.4%This article: 1.2%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion1.2%This article: 1.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 17.5%Rhiannon Rashidi: 6.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias17.5%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Rhiannon Rashidi: 7.8%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias2.9%This article: 3.2%Rhiannon Rashidi: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.3%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.7%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 29.6%Rhiannon Rashidi: 14.2%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion29.6%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.9%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.4%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.9%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal10.4%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.9%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.0%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice10.9%This article: 7.5%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination7.5%This article: 17.5%Rhiannon Rashidi: 3.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias17.5%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

588 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers61%attributed speech231writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDurst Organization • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageJulia Salazar • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJulia Salazar • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJulia Salazar • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Glenn • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMelvin Jones • 46 words • 0.0% coverageJovana Rizzo • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJovana Rizzo • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDurst Organization • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDan Holton-Roth • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDan Holton-Roth • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDan Holton-Roth • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDan Holton-Roth • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDan Holton-Roth • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Glenn • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Glenn • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Glenn • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Glenn • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Glenn • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Julia Salazar

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words17% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+81.8 ptsWriter: 18.2%Julia Salazar: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+72.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Julia Salazar: 72.1%72.1%Biased Writer Voice-27.7 ptsWriter: 27.7%Julia Salazar: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.