Gothamist76%

Fire at Queens church may answer burning question: Is Astoria's founder buried there? 10%

By Rhiannon Rashidi0%

5/3/2026, 11:00:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 373 faulty-reasoning hits from 638 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,184 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the article peer group.

A five-alarm fire at a historic Queens church may finally reveal the answer to a decades-old question: Is the “George Washington of Astoria” buried in the backyard? 
Wealthy fur trader Stephen A. 
Halsey founded the Village of Astoria in 1839, the same year the First Reformed Church of Astoria opened on what is now 12th Street. 
Halsey died in 1875, but where he was buried was a mystery. 
Historians long suspected the church was his final resting place, but no grave could be found. 
That changed in 2001, when congregants cutting back weeds for a sunflower garden came upon a 6-foot-tall obelisk that had fallen and become buried in the dirt. 
Historians thought the obelisk marked Halsey’s grave, but church leaders opted not to start digging. 
Now, a standoff is brewing between the city, which has said the First Reformed Church should be demolished, and preservationists hoping to save the historic building. 
Historians see an opportunity to solve the mystery. 
“Within the historic little community, it's like one of those sort of burning questions,” said Ava Vitali, an archeologist and president of the board of the Greater Astoria Historical Society. 
“Maybe the only good thing to come out of the fire might be the possibility to answer that question. 
Any work that's done on the site will have to consider the archeological remains.” 
Halsey is credited with planning the Village of Astoria and raising money for infrastructure like schools and factories, three local historians said in interviews. 
It was his idea to name the village after John Jacob Astor  the wealthiest man in the country at the time  in hopes it would encourage the business magnate to invest in the nascent town. 
Astor ultimately only donated $500 toward a women’s seminary and never set foot in the village named after him. 
For now, longtime Astoria residents are focused on thwarting the city’s plan to tear down the church. 
Kevin Harris was a deacon of the church for 17 years, until 2023. 
He lives directly across the street and has been a member of the congregation since he was 9. 
Harris said that the day after the fire, he retrieved a Bible that was still sitting on the pulpit. 
“This is history and if you demolish it while it's there, you're throwing over 150, almost 200 years in the garbage,” Harris said. 
“You don’t let the oldest church in Astoria get torn down.” 
The buildings department said church leaders agreed it should be torn down. 
But Harris disputed that all were on board with the plan. 
In-person services haven’t been held at the church since the pandemic. 
The congregation had become too small, and the building fell into disrepair. 
An FDNY spokesperson said the fire's cause is still under investigation. 
Five firefighters suffered minor injuries during the blaze. 
Now, the fellowship hall that hosted Sunday school is a hollow wooden shell. 
The sanctuary is full of debris and is missing a roof. 
Yet the church steeple and much of the main brick building still stand. 
Residents and historians say there is a lot left to save. 
“I don't see this building being eligible to be torn down. 
It’s not a lost cause in any stretch of the imagination,” said Bob Singleton, executive director of the Greater Astoria Historical Society. 
”When they built buildings in these days, they built them to last.” 
Singleton isn’t expecting much will be left of Halsey, if archaeologists get a chance to dig once the site's future is determined. 
“Since he died almost 200 years ago, maybe we'd find some teeth,” Singleton said. 
“I do have a feeling that he's there. 
We disturb graves all the time, but [people back then] didn't, it was a sacred kind of a thing.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Rhiannon Rashidi: 8.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 3.6%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion3.6%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.4%Rhiannon Rashidi: 6.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.4%This article: 3.4%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 7.8%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.3%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.8%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority3.8%This article: 4.1%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.7%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.6%Rhiannon Rashidi: 14.2%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion3.6%This article: 1.7%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.9%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 4.9%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.7%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote4.7%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 2.0%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 3.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rhiannon Rashidi: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

638 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers32%attributed speech432writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAva Vitali • 30 words • 100.0% coverageAva Vitali • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAva Vitali • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Harris • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Harris • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBuildings Department • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageFDNY • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBob Singleton • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBob Singleton • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBob Singleton • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBob Singleton • 14 words • 0.0% coverageBob Singleton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBob Singleton • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kevin Harris

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words17% of attributed speech45% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.