Topic summary
51% 38 analyzed articles/videos 17,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Football results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 9,545 hits . Analysis detected 79,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 83,727 analyzed words across 37 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,978 of 16,562 topics). This Football is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Football
Topic details
Total words: 83,727
Article count: 37
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score37 analyzed articles83.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst