Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Goldblatt results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 351 hits . Analysis detected 1,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 579 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of 98% (153 of 6,358 authors). This David Goldblatt is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. David Goldblatt
Author details
Total words: 579
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.6% percentile 15.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles579 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 60.6% 60.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 47.0% 47.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 17.8% 17.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.8% 31.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 14.3% 14.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 25.6% 25.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 18.1% 18.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 60.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 47.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 31.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 18.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst