Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dan Jackson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 1,033 hits . Analysis detected 3,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Dan Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dan Jackson
Author details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 33.7% 33.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.1% 21.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 33.7%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst