Author summary
41% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jakob Barnes results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 7,439 hits . Analysis detected 23,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,220 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,864 of 6,348 authors). This Jakob Barnes is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Jakob Barnes
Author details
Total words: 28,220
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles28.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 26.4% 26.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 26.4%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst