Author summary
79%1 analyzed article/video1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quico Toro results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 1,025 hits. Analysis detected 5,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,805 of 6,170 authors). This Quico Toro is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Quico Toro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Quico Toro (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 24.6%24.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.3%15.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos