Author summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mick Hume results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 2,184 hits . Analysis detected 11,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,836 of 6,628 authors). This Mick Hume is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Mick Hume
Author details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.0% 34.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.4% 14.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst