Author summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curt Conrad results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 251 hits . Analysis detected 2,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,457 of 6,628 authors). This Curt Conrad is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Curt Conrad
Author details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst