Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Guides results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 1,522 hits. Analysis detected 7,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,388 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,530 of 15,265 topics). This Food Guides is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.3%28.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos