Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos4,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Addison results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 8,896 hits. Analysis detected 41,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,884 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (2,686 of 6,169 authors). This Bill Addison is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Bill Addison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠57%Bill Addison (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 31,884
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.9%27.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.2%11.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos