These are the 101 best restaurants in Los Angeles 2024, ranked 60%

By Bill Addison0% Jenn Harris0%

12/4/2024, 5:23:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 1,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 349 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.2% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,319 of 20,447 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the article peer group.

There is no such thing as the quintessential Los Angeles restaurant. 
That’s the soul-deep beauty of dining in our city. 
The street stand where burnt-orange birria juice drips onto your T-shirt from your third taco defines the L.A. experience as much as the holiest omakase counter, the scrappiest natural wine bar and the latest steakhouse-style burger sensation. 
Some chefs arrange lettuces among summertime peaches so otherworldly in flavor they all but cross into science fiction. 
That describes our glory with salads  as do the stinging lime and crisped rice of nam khao tod, and the specific tang of dried mint and pomegranate molasses in fattoush made by careful, practiced hands. 
The 101 Best Restaurants in Los Angeles, now in its 12th year, is a guide to excellence but also the annual family photo:: The calendar flips and we don’t look quite the same as before. 
Food columnist Jenn Harris joins me as co-author of this 2024 edition. 
After several cycles of tackling the 101 project solo, I’ve been traveling more to report on dining across California, so our two-person approach to surveying L.A.’s paragons made wonderful sense. 
We crisscrossed the region for months, checking in on stalwarts and swapping notes on potentially overlooked contenders. 
We agreed a lot and debated plenty (especially about pizza). 
We asked ourselves over and over: Which mix of restaurants tells the most compelling, complete and delicious story about Los Angeles? 
This is our answer. 
Additionally, Jenn and I welcome five honorees to the 101’s Hall of Fame list. 
These are icons with names you’ll likely recognize, run by chefs who’ve fundamentally shaped L.A. dining. 
We also point out seven of our favorite new places for drinking  mostly wine and spirits, but including a Studio City shop serving Middle Eastern-inspired coffee brewed in sand. 
If our dining culture defies easy categorization, at its finest it also embodies creative possibility and connection at the table. 
Our lives, it seems to me, could use these virtues more than ever. 
 Bill Addison, restaurant critic 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.2%Bill Addison: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 24.1%Bill Addison: 7.2%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic24.1%This article: 13.8%Bill Addison: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic13.8%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Bill Addison: 4.9%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias9.7%This article: 28.4%Bill Addison: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect28.4%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.0%Bill Addison: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias10.0%This article: 8.6%Bill Addison: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect8.6%This article: 16.9%Bill Addison: 4.3%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias16.9%This article: 6.9%Bill Addison: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 5.7%Bill Addison: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Bill Addison: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.1%Bill Addison: 14.9%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect20.1%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Bill Addison: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect10.0%This article: 3.2%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.0%Bill Addison: 6.4%Daily Pilot: 5.0%Appeal to Authority16.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 8.6%Bill Addison: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning8.6%This article: 18.9%Bill Addison: 5.9%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization18.9%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.2%Bill Addison: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon3.2%This article: 20.1%Bill Addison: 4.4%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion20.1%This article: 4.9%Bill Addison: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question4.9%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.0%Bill Addison: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 29.2%Bill Addison: 7.3%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Anecdotal29.2%This article: 3.2%Bill Addison: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.2%This article: 30.1%Bill Addison: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)30.1%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%Bill Addison: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground6.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 8.6%Bill Addison: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection8.6%This article: 18.1%Bill Addison: 27.9%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice18.1%This article: 5.7%Bill Addison: 4.5%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination5.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Addison: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Bill Addison: 11.2%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.7%

349 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.4%attributed speech344writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBill Addison • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill Addison

100%flagged-word coverage
5 attributed words100% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-18.3 ptsWriter: 18.3%Bill Addison: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.9 ptsWriter: 11.9%Bill Addison: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.7 ptsWriter: 8.7%Bill Addison: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Bill Addison: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.