Keyword summary
82% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Restaurants results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 2,342 hits . Analysis detected 11,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,715 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (23,842 of 35,648 keywords). This New Restaurants is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. New Restaurants
Keyword details
Total words: 11,715
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst