Author summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alix Wall results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 3,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,071 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,319 of 6,628 authors). This Alix Wall is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Alix Wall
Author details
Total words: 4,071
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst