Topic summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 12,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Dining results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 15,286 hits . Analysis detected 63,918 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,855 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,522 of 15,265 topics). This Los Angeles Dining is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Los Angeles Dining
Topic details
Total words: 55,855
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles55.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 27.4% 27.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst