Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Khushbu Shah results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,387 hits . Analysis detected 6,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,388 of 6,628 authors). This Khushbu Shah is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Khushbu Shah
Author details
Total words: 4,260
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.1% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.6% 32.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.2% 21.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.2%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst