Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sarah Mosqueda results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 2,331 hits. Analysis detected 14,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Sarah Mosqueda is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sarah Mosqueda
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Sarah Mosqueda (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 14,560
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.0%16.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 12.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos