Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hall Of Fame results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 3,549 hits . Analysis detected 20,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,696 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (26,989 of 34,703 keywords). This Hall Of Fame is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Hall Of Fame
Keyword details
Total words: 23,696
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst