Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos4,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abbey Mastracco results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 2,204 hits. Analysis detected 14,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,355 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (4,310 of 6,140 authors). This Abbey Mastracco is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Abbey Mastracco
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠30%Abbey Mastracco (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,355
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos