Author summary
21% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,376 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacqueline Lindenberg results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 3,432 hits . Analysis detected 19,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,672 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,932 of 6,316 authors). This Jacqueline Lindenberg is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Jacqueline Lindenberg
Author details
Total words: 37,672
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score12 analyzed articles37.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst