Original SNL star Garrett Morris, 89, goes viral with eye-popping photo of his bulge: 'I can't unsee it' 20%

By Jacqueline Lindenberg22%

6/19/2026, 4:34:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 1,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 768 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,604 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the article peer group.

Original SNL cast member Garrett Morris has gone viral with an eye-popping snap of his bulge and offered a hilarious response to fans. 
The 89-year-old star, who is one of the founding cast members of the sketch comedy series, was featured in an Instagram photo shared by actress Taraji P. 
Henson earlier this week. 
She had been celebrating her official Broadway debut in Joe Turner's Come And Gone and gave a glimpse at some of the stars who came to support her during the special milestone. 
And while Morris and Henson posed for a seemingly innocent picture together, social media users flocked to the comment section to share their thoughts on a very specific aspect in the snap. 
Henson has since taken down the slide from the Instagram carousel, but that didn't stop some followers from still commenting on the iconic actor's pants. 
One penned, 'Now why yall didn't fix jr pants?!' 
while referring to his character Uncle Junior on The Jamie Foxx Show. 
'Now who took that picture. yal could've told the man to straighten his britches,' another typed out. 
A fan wrote, 'LMAOOOOO YALL DONE MADE THIS LADY POST AND DELETE. i know jr called her like put it back,' and one shared, 'YALL SHE REMOVED IT.' 
Over on X, more offered their comments as one said, 'Are y'all seeing what I'm seeing,' while another added, 'Y'all notice something or have I lost my d*** mind?' 
'Taraji looks amazing, Garrett is a legend, but can we all be honest for second? 
My eyes wandered somewhere else, and now I can't unsee it. 
The longer you look, the more questions you start asking.' 
And earlier this week on Thursday, Morris jumped to his main Instagram page to share his response in regards to the viral photo. 
'Well, hello there. 
I'm Garrett Morris and it seems I've caused quite a stir because of a recent photo where it looks like I have a baby boa constrictor between my legs,' he began in a clip. 
'Now, I don't mind holding up these stereotypes usually given to Black men but ladies and gentleman, I'm more than a body. 
I'm a brain too, okay?' 
he humorously added while pointing towards his head. 
Morris then told his followers and fans about his upcoming memoir Ain't That A B**** which is set to be released next year. 
In the caption of his video, the actor penned: 'I see the internet has been busy. 
With everybody talking, I figured I'd give you something new to talk about...' 
Morris made an appearance on Saturday Night Live as part of the founding cast and was also the first Black cast member. 
He starred on the sketch comedy series from 1975 until his exit five years later in 1980. 
'Whether you were a Democrat or a Republican, you got hit by the comedy of SNL,' Morris said in an essay for Time last year. 
'Now, the whole country is sort of sideways, so you have to be very brave to make fun of a lot of what should be made fun of. 
It doesn't seem quite as courageous as it was then.' 
During his time on the show, the actor said that there was 'a lot of energy, and a lot of beautiful people.' 
He added, 'I was just amazed at the brilliance of the improvisation - Gilda Radner, John Belushi, Chevy Chase. 
They were all just such talented people, and I was really honored to be a part of that group.' 
Following his time on SNL, Morris went on to appear in a number of shows such as The Jeffersons, The Love Boat, Married... 
With Children and ER. 
From 1996 through 2001, the star was cast as Uncle Junior on the sitcom The Jamie Foxx Show. 
He also played the character of Earl on the CBS series 2 Broke Girls from 2011 until 2017. 
Morris still has more projects under his belt such as the upcoming comedy titled Freaky Deaky. 
Shortly before his 89th birthday in February, Morris reflected on aging and unveiled his biggest regret. 
'Ask me what I'll be doing on my birthday. 
Regretting the passage of time,' he told People. 
The SNL alum continued, 'I just felt if you enjoy your work, why not do it to the best you can in whatever way you are asked to do it until you transform. 
'I mean, let's be realistic, there are less roles for an 80-year-old who's got arthritis - but there are roles out there.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.8%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.8%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.8%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 4.2%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 1.3%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 4.6%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 2.2%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias12.2%This article: 7.6%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias7.6%This article: 10.7%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 3.6%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias10.7%This article: 0.7%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.4%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias4.4%This article: 2.9%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 9.1%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect9.8%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias8.6%This article: 3.3%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.1%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 2.0%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority6.1%This article: 8.6%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma8.6%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 2.1%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.2%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon4.2%This article: 6.9%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.2%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion6.9%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.0%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.9%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.2%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal10.9%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.6%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.6%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.3%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground1.3%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.5%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 2.4%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote15.5%This article: 2.3%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 8.6%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 6.7%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice8.6%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Jacqueline Lindenberg: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.7%

768 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech566writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 34 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 28 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageGarrett Morris • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Garrett Morris

94%flagged-word coverage
202 attributed words100% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote-21.0 ptsWriter: 21.0%Garrett Morris: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +17.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Garrett Morris: 17.8%17.8%Biased Writer Voice-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Garrett Morris: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Garrett Morris: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.