Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 14,907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Bethke results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 5,998 hits . Analysis detected 45,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,947 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,571 of 6,316 authors). This Lauren Bethke is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Lauren Bethke
Author details
Total words: 46,947
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles46.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst