Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lucas Kwan Peterson results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,172 authors). This Lucas Kwan Peterson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lucas Kwan Peterson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Lucas Kwan Peterson (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,664
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.9%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos