Topic summary
76% 20 analyzed articles/videos 20,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fashion results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 19,679 hits . Analysis detected 103,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 86,653 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,444 of 16,259 topics). This Fashion is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Fashion
Topic details
Total words: 86,653
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score20 analyzed articles86.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 22.7% 22.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst