Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raven Saunt results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,129 hits . Analysis detected 6,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,539 of 6,359 authors). This Raven Saunt is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Raven Saunt
Author details
Total words: 5,296
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.8% 20.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 21.3% 21.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 21.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst