Best and WORST dressed guests at Michael Rubin's star-studded White Party ⁠82%

By Raven Saunt⁠0%

7/1/2026, 7:26:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 84.4% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 1,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 553 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,000 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the article peer group.

Every year, Michael Rubin hosts a star-studded bash in honor of July 4 with a strict all-white dress code. 
Celebrities go wild at the sportswear mogul's $50 million mansion in the Hamptons for his annual blowout bash - but this time, the celebration is a little earlier than usual. 
The lavish gathering has been brought forward to avoid clashing with the upcoming wedding of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce, who are rumored to be tying the knot this week in New York. 
And so, the 53-year-old Fanatics founder instead welcomed A-listers on Wednesday evening. 
Alicia Keys, Livvy Dunne, Alix Earle, Cardi B and Victoria's Secret star Jasmine Tookes were among the famous faces in the crowds. 
There were some outstanding ensembles on display, complete with elegant trains, luxury materials and inspiring design choices. 
But not everyone's outfits have been standing up to scrutiny under the sartorial spotlight with a selection of stars plagued by fashion faux pas. 
Here, the Daily Mail has rounded up the best and worst dressed stars at Rubin's White Party this year. 
BEST 
Alicia Keys dazzled in a shimmering turtleneck jumpsuit as she mingled guests on an outdoor terrace at Michael Rubin's annual White Party in the Hamptons on Wednesday. 
The glittery ensemble accentuated her curves and left her toned shoulders on full display 
Designer Sofia Bianchessi looked effortlessly chic in a $2,300 maxi dress by Silvia Tcherassi that boasted a plunging neckline and ruching to the midriff with a nautilus-inspired resin ornament 
Author Lisa Ramos, 36, opted for a playful $115 halter-neck mini dress from Oh Polly that boasted semi-sheer chiffon, scooped low back and tiered ruffle mini skirt before being finished with two delicate floral corsages at the neckline and hip 
Influencer Carter Gregory kept it casual in a long sleeve chiffon top that boasted tie detailing around the collar. 
He wore the trendy piece largely unbuttoned and paired it with white jeans 
Influencer Carolyn Estephany showcased her fashion credentials in a crisp white, high halter-neck bodysuit with wrap around skirt. 
The ensemble flashed plenty of flesh but she kept her her accessories simple with gold necklaces, bracelets and a pair of statement sunglasses 
Victoria's Secret supermodel Jasmine Tookes looked ethereal as she posed in a classic white minidress with a cinched waist 
Dutch skater Jutta Leerdam was seen at the event with her fiancé Jake Paul, and she looked stunning in a white gown that contained a very low-cut neckline and thigh-high slit 
WORST 
Blonde beauty Alix Earle, 25, (left) risked a serious wardrobe malfunction in a barely-there ensemble that showcased her enviable physique as she opted to match with fellow influencer Anastasia Karanikolaou (right) 
Livvy Dunne, 23, wore too many mismatched textures with a $239 figure-hugging maxi dress by British womenswear brand House of CB - complete with ruched mesh, square neck and bustier-inspired bodice. 
She finished the look with white open-toe heels, pearl bracelet, shell-beaded bag and metallic phone case 
Cardi B nearly suffered an X-rated wardrobe malfunction in a white dress that was a little too low-cut for comfort 
Former NFL star Rob Gronkowski, 37, played it a little too safe with a somewhat boring ensemble that simply consisted of white linen pants and a short sleeved collared shirt with textured detailing 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.6%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Raven Saunt: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias5.6%This article: 18.1%Raven Saunt: 3.6%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic18.1%This article: 11.2%Raven Saunt: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Raven Saunt: 6.0%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.6%Raven Saunt: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Raven Saunt: 1.5%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias5.4%This article: 10.3%Raven Saunt: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias10.3%This article: 34.5%Raven Saunt: 10.2%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias34.5%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Raven Saunt: 2.5%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error8.9%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 26.2%Raven Saunt: 21.3%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect26.2%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 5.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Raven Saunt: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Raven Saunt: 3.2%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.6%Raven Saunt: 4.9%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization13.6%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 28.6%Raven Saunt: 10.5%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion28.6%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.1%Raven Saunt: 1.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.1%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 3.6%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.6%Raven Saunt: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.6%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Raven Saunt: 1.8%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 84.4%Raven Saunt: 20.8%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice84.4%This article: 14.3%Raven Saunt: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination14.3%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Raven Saunt: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Raven Saunt: 4.9%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

553 words analyzed.

Speakers

12speakers63%attributed speech207writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageDaily Mail • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAlicia Keys • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageSofia Bianchessi • 29 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Ramos • 40 words • 100.0% coverageCarter Gregory • 19 words • 100.0% coverageCarter Gregory • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCarolyn Estephany • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJasmine Tookes • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJutta Leerdam • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAlix Earle • 31 words • 100.0% coverageLivvy Dunne • 31 words • 100.0% coverageLivvy Dunne • 16 words • 100.0% coverageCardi B • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRob Gronkowski • 33 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alix Earle

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words9.0% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alix Earle: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+26.1 ptsWriter: 73.9%Alix Earle: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.