Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lifestylefashion results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,658 hits. Analysis detected 8,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,336 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,800 of 37,536 keywords). This Lifestylefashion is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Lifestylefashion
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
72%Lifestylefashion (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,336
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 19.2%19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate