Author summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Herz results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,347 hits . Analysis detected 8,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,250 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,634 of 6,316 authors). This Jane Herz is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Jane Herz
Author details
Total words: 10,250
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 13.1% 13.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst