Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alix Earle results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (151 of 28,364 speakers). This Alix Earle is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Alix Earle
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos