Author summary
59% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coleman Spilde results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 5,869 hits . Analysis detected 31,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,552 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,871 of 6,629 authors). This Coleman Spilde is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Coleman Spilde
Author details
Total words: 27,552
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.0% 12.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst