Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carrie McCabe results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Loss Aversion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 77.7% saturation with 9,228 hits . Analysis detected 21,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,180 of 6,628 authors). This Carrie McCabe is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Carrie McCabe
Author details
Total words: 11,880
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.2% percentile 4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 77.7% 77.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 77.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.2%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst