Prime Day deals end tonight: Live updates on the best last-chance sales from Apple, Adidas, Hanes, Shark and more — plus deals to skip ⁠92%

By Britt Ross⁠0% Carrie McCabe⁠0% Chris McGraw⁠0% Rebecca Carhart⁠0%

6/2/2026, 9:59:51 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 82.9% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 1,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 392 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,853 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the article peer group.

Calling all procrastinators! 
If you haven't yet taken advantage of Amazon Prime Day deals, you only have a few hours left to save up to 70% on brands like Hanes, Shark, KitchenAid and more. 
To make sure time and deals are on your side, our team of professional deal hunters has been working around the clock to dig up the deepest discounts for your shopping (and saving) pleasure. 
Don't experience FOMO: Frugal Edition — get that virtual shopping cart revved up, stat! 
5 popular Prime Day deals worth buying: 
Hanes Men's Zip-Up Hoodie ($9, was $28): 66% off 
Apple Airpods Pro 3 ($179, was $249): Save $70 
Beckham Hotel Collection Bed Pillows ($40, was $80): 50% off 
iRobot Roomba 415X Robot Vacuum & Mop ($400, was $800): Save $400 
Audible Subscription ($0.99/mo, was $8.99/mo): Save over 80% on your first three months and get a $20 Audible credit 
New Prime Day deals today: 
Hanes Men's Boxers ($11, was $24): 90-day low price 
Michael Kors Alice Small Top Zip Shoulder Bag ($111, was $260): 57% off 
Dyson Supersonic Nural™ Hair Dryer ($327, was $450): Rare 27% off 
Nespresso Vertuo Coffee and Espresso Maker ($89, was $179): 50% off 
Stanley Soft Cooler Bag ($50, was $100): Rare 50% off 
Don't be fooled by certain Prime Day "deals": 
Curious as to how we select the very best deals? 
Glad you asked! 
Our writers and editors are all seasoned experts in their fields. 
We know a good sale when we see one, and we only include markdowns we believe will save you money. 
Just because something is "on sale" doesn't mean you should buy it. 
Starting prices can be inflated to make discounts seem bigger than they are, and some items may actually cost less at other retailers. 
Our team knows what to grab and what to hold off on, like the $24 Apple AirTag (you're better off buying the 4-pack, which brings the price down to just over $22 per tracker). 
We've also found some Lego deals that are up to $15 cheaper at Walmart, and if you're after the coveted Ninja Slushi, the $200 Amazon deal has already sold out, but you can find the price-matched deal at Best Buy. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.1%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 45.4%Britt Ross: 14.7%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias45.4%This article: 17.3%Britt Ross: 3.0%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic17.3%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 25.3%Britt Ross: 4.2%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias25.3%This article: 16.6%Britt Ross: 4.5%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect16.6%This article: 32.7%Britt Ross: 10.7%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion32.7%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Britt Ross: 0.1%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.8%This article: 7.9%Britt Ross: 0.3%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias7.9%This article: 5.1%Britt Ross: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Britt Ross: 8.1%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Britt Ross: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias9.2%This article: 3.8%Britt Ross: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.8%Britt Ross: 12.2%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority13.8%This article: 6.1%Britt Ross: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma6.1%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 5.1%Britt Ross: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning5.1%This article: 10.2%Britt Ross: 5.6%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization10.2%This article: 2.0%Britt Ross: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring2.0%This article: 12.0%Britt Ross: 3.4%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon12.0%This article: 31.9%Britt Ross: 5.9%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion31.9%This article: 5.1%Britt Ross: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question5.1%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.9%Britt Ross: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof5.9%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 3.2%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.4%Britt Ross: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 8.7%Britt Ross: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading8.7%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.9%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.6%Britt Ross: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.6%This article: 19.4%Britt Ross: 6.8%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice19.4%This article: 6.6%Britt Ross: 5.7%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination6.6%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Britt Ross: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 82.9%Britt Ross: 77.7%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…82.9%

392 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.