Topic summary
71% 31 analyzed articles/videos 11,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Electronics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 8,013 hits . Analysis detected 56,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,146 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,284 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Electronics is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Consumer Electronics
Topic details
Total words: 50,146
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score31 analyzed articles50.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst