The Verge56%

Qualcomm is about to raise prices and that’s bad news for everyone 68%

By Stevie Bonifield47%

7/24/2026, 12:14:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 584 faulty-reasoning hits from 215 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,066 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the article peer group.

Qualcomm sent a letter to customers on Friday warning of plans to increase its prices by “a percentage in the double digits,” Bloomberg reports. 
The price hikes will go into effect starting with products shipped after September 1st. 
Qualcomm claims it has “exhausted its ability to absorb higher costs from suppliers,” as ongoing component shortages continue to drive up prices. 
The company also said it attempted to source components from alternate suppliers prior to announcing the price hikes. 
As Bloomberg notes, Qualcomm’s price increases will likely have a ripple effect, particularly for smartphones. 
Qualcomm’s chips power everything from Samsung’s new foldables to upcoming smartglasses. 
Earlier this year, Qualcomm even promised one of its new chip platforms would deliver $300 Windows PCs. 
Those devices could get pricier if device manufacturers pass the brunt of Qualcomm’s price hikes onto their customers. 
Qualcomm’s far from the only company bumping up its prices. 
Seemingly everything is getting more expensive as a result of component shortages, including Xbox consoles, Raspberry Pi boards, most Apple devices, and Samsung and Google’s smartphones. 
Some devices are even getting downgraded specs alongside higher prices, while other devices are getting canceled or delayed. 
Qualcomm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.5%The Verge: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 30.2%Stevie Bonifield: 9.4%The Verge: 3.8%Availability Heuristic30.2%This article: 7.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.3%The Verge: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic7.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Stevie Bonifield: 1.1%The Verge: 6.2%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.6%The Verge: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.2%Stevie Bonifield: 2.0%The Verge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 4.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Stevie Bonifield: 4.8%The Verge: 2.4%Pessimism Bias14.0%This article: 26.0%Stevie Bonifield: 13.3%The Verge: 9.7%Negativity Bias26.0%This article: 8.4%Stevie Bonifield: 5.2%The Verge: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 2.0%The Verge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Stevie Bonifield: 1.5%The Verge: 0.4%Primacy Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 8.4%Stevie Bonifield: 1.6%The Verge: 1.2%Slippery Slope8.4%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.7%Stevie Bonifield: 11.1%The Verge: 6.8%Hasty Generalization17.7%This article: 7.9%Stevie Bonifield: 1.5%The Verge: 0.2%Red Herring7.9%This article: 4.7%Stevie Bonifield: 1.8%The Verge: 0.7%Bandwagon4.7%This article: 5.6%Stevie Bonifield: 1.1%The Verge: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 10.2%Stevie Bonifield: 2.0%The Verge: 1.1%Begging the Question10.2%This article: 19.1%Stevie Bonifield: 3.6%The Verge: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.1%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 13.5%Stevie Bonifield: 2.6%The Verge: 0.3%Composition/Division13.5%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.2%Stevie Bonifield: 2.0%The Verge: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.2%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 8.4%Stevie Bonifield: 1.6%The Verge: 0.2%Special Pleading8.4%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 29.8%Stevie Bonifield: 5.7%The Verge: 2.6%Unattributed Quote29.8%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 27.0%Stevie Bonifield: 9.6%The Verge: 10.8%Biased Writer Voice27.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

215 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech175writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageQualcomm • 22 words • 100.0% coverageQualcomm • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Qualcomm

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words100% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+86.3 ptsWriter: 13.7%Qualcomm: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+34.4 ptsWriter: 20.6%Qualcomm: 55.0%55.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.