Author summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Collins results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 349 hits . Analysis detected 4,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,094 of 6,316 authors). This Katie Collins is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Katie Collins
Author details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.7% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 8.0% 8.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.1% 7.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst