Author summary
86% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Oropeza results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 6,747 hits . Analysis detected 23,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,542 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,506 of 6,605 authors). This Daniel Oropeza is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Daniel Oropeza
Author details
Total words: 16,542
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.2% percentile 4.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 40.8% 40.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 40.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst