Author summary
100% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naima Karp results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 3,397 hits . Analysis detected 11,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,634 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (766 of 6,363 authors). This Naima Karp is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Naima Karp
Author details
Total words: 5,634
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.0% percentile 6.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 60.3% 60.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.3% 19.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.6% 13.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 60.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 19.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst