Author summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew E. Freedman results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 345 hits . Analysis detected 2,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,533 of 6,315 authors). This Andrew E. Freedman is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Andrew E. Freedman
Author details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst