Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Rendon results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Availability Heuristic , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 761 hits . Analysis detected 3,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,852 of 6,629 authors). This Christine Rendon is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Christine Rendon
Author details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.9% 7.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.0% 9.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.8%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.0%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Horn Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst