Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Stechyson results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,690 of 6,628 authors). This Natalie Stechyson is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Natalie Stechyson
Author details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst