Author summary
ā 44% 1 analyzed article/video 631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Bloch results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,893 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 62% (2,565 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Bloch is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Emily Bloch
Author details
Total words: 1,893
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst