Topic summary
60% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Crisis results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 3,957 hits . Analysis detected 38,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,403 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,802 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Energy Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 35,403
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score12 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst