Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shoko Oda results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 114 hits . Analysis detected 844 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ā 64% (2,399 of 6,628 authors). This Shoko Oda is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Shoko Oda
Author details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst