STLPR0%

As gas hits $4 a gallon, St. Louisans park their cars, scrimp on groceries or eat the cost 80%

By Chad Davis0%

4/14/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 499 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,309 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the article peer group.

The average price of gas in the St. 
Louis region has reached $4 per gallon, creating sticker shock at the pumps for St. 
Louis drivers. 
A survey by gas station watchdog GasBuddy found prices across St. 
Louis are about 60.8 cents higher than last month and about a dollar higher than a year ago. 
As of Monday afternoon, a gallon of regular gas at the Gas Mart on Delmar Boulevard cost $3.99. 
Many drivers filling their tanks have already started to feel the pain, including Jordan Griffin, who lives and works about a mile from the station. 
“I don't feel like it's been this hot since I've had a car, and I've had a car probably about 9 to 10 years,” Griffin said. 
“If prices keep going up, I'm going to park this bad baby unless I'm going somewhere outside of work, which is not often.” 
Prices have increased significantly since the United States and Israel attacked Iran in February. 
Those increases eased in some parts of the country after President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire last week; however, Americans should brace for another round of increases after discussions fell through, GasBuddy Head of Petroleum Analysis Patrick De Haan said in a statement. 
“The move toward a full blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is compounding global supply concerns and risks further disrupting flows, which pushed oil prices sharply higher in Sunday night trading,” De Haan said. 
”As a result, gasoline prices are likely to jump again this week, with diesel expected to follow, until there is a meaningful restoration of shipping through the Strait.” 
It’s a shock to the wallet for Carl Haney, who was on his way to Interstate 270 and Riverview. 
“The gas that I buy is $4.29 a gallon because that's what my car burns,” Haney said. 
“I have no choice but to buy it: I have to go to work, I have to go home, I have to help my mother.” 
Haney, a Marine veteran, said he hopes that the war ends soon and that prices turn around. 
He’s already had to change his purchasing habits, including buying fewer groceries. 
Haney also said he was considering buying a second car that doesn’t use as much fuel. 
High gas prices helped influence Maanas Bhatt to purchase a hybrid car to save on gas. 
“It’s about $4 here right now, about six months ago, that was the price of gas out on the West Coast where I live,” Bhatt said. 
“Now gas prices over there are like, $6 or $7. 
It's a sight to see.” 
Gas prices in California are the highest in the country. 
Parts of central Illinois surpassed $4 a gallon last week. 
Food delivery driver Tilford Hendricks said he has no choice but to pay the price. 
“Trump needs to stay out of these people's business so they can stop raising these prices,” Hendricks said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.8%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias6.8%This article: 8.8%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias8.8%This article: 7.2%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 5.6%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Chad Davis: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect10.2%This article: 16.0%Chad Davis: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion16.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect3.2%This article: 3.4%Chad Davis: 4.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 18.8%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias18.8%This article: 25.3%Chad Davis: 9.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias25.3%This article: 3.2%Chad Davis: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 5.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.8%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.2%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority23.2%This article: 16.2%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma16.2%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.6%Chad Davis: 9.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion9.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 16.4%Chad Davis: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.4%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 48.1%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal48.1%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.4%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.4%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.2%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 8.6%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination8.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

499 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers65%attributed speech173writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGasBuddy • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Griffin • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Griffin • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 43 words • 100.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 34 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageCarl Haney • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCarl Haney • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCarl Haney • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCarl Haney • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCarl Haney • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMaanas Bhatt • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMaanas Bhatt • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMaanas Bhatt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTilford Hendricks • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTilford Hendricks • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tilford Hendricks

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words10% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.0 ptsWriter: 15.0%Tilford Hendricks: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.