Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Gas Prices results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,204 of 37,304 keywords). This Missouri Gas Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Missouri Gas Prices
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
76%Missouri Gas Prices (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos