Trump extends Jones Act waiver to August to lower fuel prices 85%

By OAN Staff Jenna Lee0%

4/24/2026, 8:57:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 881 faulty-reasoning hits from 550 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.2% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,454 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the article peer group.

This photograph shows the Bunkering Tanker GAS VITALITY (L) and the Oil and Chemical Tanker HAFNIA MAGELLAN waiting in the Grand Port Maritime de Marseille-Fos with the DPF "Depot Petrolier de France" in the background in Fos-sur-Mer, off the Mediterranean coast of southern France on March 11, 2026. 
The 32 member countries of the International Energy Agency (IEA) decided on March 11, 2026 to unlock 400 million barrels of oil from their reserves -- the biggest such release ever -- to ease the impact of the Middle East war. 
(Photo by Thibaud MORITZ / AFP via Getty Images) 
OAN Staff Jenna Lee 
6:32 PM  Friday, April 24, 2026 
The Trump administration announced that a waiver of the Jones Act will be extended for another 90 days to lower fuel prices and to make it easier to ship oil, fuel, and fertilizer around the nation amid the conflict in Iran, which is in its second month. 
The waiver, initially set to expire on May 17th, will allow foreign vessels to move goods through U.S. ports until mid-August. 
“This waiver extension provides both certainty and stability for the US and global economies,” stated Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman. 
“The Trump administration has taken several actions to mitigate short-term disruptions to the energy markets, and this extension will help ensure vital energy products, industrial materials and agricultural necessities are maintained.” 
Rogers shared how the waiver, since it took effect on March 18th, has enabled more supply to be received through U.S. ports on X. 
President Trump issued a 90-day extension to the Jones Act waiver. 
New data compiled since the initial waiver was issued revealed that significantly more supply was able to reach U.S. ports faster. 
This waiver extension provides both certainty and stability for the U.S. and… 
 Taylor Rogers (@TaylorRogers47) April 24, 2026 
Driven by fuel costs and the strategic closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the administration took action to stabilize the energy market. 
At the time of this decision, the global energy landscape was under significant strain, with Brent crude trading at $105 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) reaching $95, while the national average for gasoline hit the $4 per gallon mark. 
To alleviate these pressures, the president issued a temporary waiver of the 1920 Jones Act, a federal statute that normally mandates all goods transported between domestic ports be carried on vessels that are U.S.-built, U.S.-owned, and U.S.-flagged. 
This targeted exemption applies to a broad range of energy-related commodities, including crude oil, coal, natural gas, refined petroleum products, and fertilizers. 
Government records indicate that the waiver, originally enacted in March, has already facilitated the domestic transport of diverse cargoes such as renewable diesel, ammonia, ethanol, and gasoline to key states including California, Florida, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. 
Recognizing the continued volatility of the market, a White House official confirmed that the Trump administration is extending this waiver three weeks ahead of its scheduled expiration. 
This proactive extension is designed to provide the maritime industry with the necessary lead time to secure sufficient vessel capacity, ensuring that critical energy derivatives continue to reach their destinations without further logistical bottlenecks. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.1%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.4%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias19.1%This article: 7.5%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias7.5%This article: 11.8%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.4%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic11.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias3.8%This article: 19.5%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 11.0%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect19.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.9%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 3.6%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 4.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 7.5%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 8.7%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error4.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.5%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.5%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 5.5%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority15.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 3.7%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 9.6%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 11.8%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question11.8%This article: 30.4%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.6%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)30.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.8%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal3.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote2.2%This article: 2.2%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.2%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 5.2%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 4.2%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%OAN Staff Jenna Lee: 2.4%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

550 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech467writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Rogers • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Rogers • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Rogers • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Rogers • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Taylor Rogers

92%flagged-word coverage
83 attributed words100% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Taylor Rogers: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Taylor Rogers: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Taylor Rogers: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.