Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dasha Litvinova results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 882 hits . Analysis detected 4,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,796 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,758 of 6,315 authors). This Dasha Litvinova is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Dasha Litvinova
Author details
Total words: 3,796
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.1% 23.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 23.2% 23.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst