BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 178 hits. Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 605 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.8% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,464 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the article peer group.

Lines are growing at Russian gas stations -- and so is the frustration and uncertainty as several months of Ukrainian attacks have set oil refineries ablaze and choked supplies for motorists across the vast country. 
Fuel rationing has been introduced in many regions, with hourslong queues of cars snaking beside roads. 
Social media videos show drivers aghast at the lines or swearing at empty gas pumps and rising prices. 
The fuel crisis  unprecedented for a nation that is one of the world’s biggest energy producers  has brought Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine home to ordinary Russians like few other events in the war, now in its fifth year. 
It drew a rare admission from President Vladimir Putin, who acknowledged that “problems persist for both motorists and businesses. ... and there are still queues at petrol stations, and finding the right grade of petrol isn’t always easy.” 
Putin insisted the shortages are “not critical” and “temporary.” 
But that appeared to do little to reassure at least one motorist in Moscow, the wealthy capital typically better-insulated from economic shocks than the rest of the country. 
“I think the situation is not very good,” the motorist waiting in line told The Associated Press on Monday, the day after Putin’s televised remarks. 
“They say one thing on television, and in reality it’s another. ... 
People are queueing everywhere,” he added, declining to identify himself out of concern for his safety. 
Ukraine hits energy targets multiple times 
An AP count shows over 50 reported attacks by Ukraine on oil refineries, depots, terminals and other oil infrastructure in Russia and the illegally annexed Crimean Peninsula since late March. 
Often, the same facility is hit more than once -- such as the refinery in the Black Sea town of Tuapse, which was struck four times in just over two weeks. 
As a result, the amount of crude oil Russia processed into fuel in June was down 25% from a year ago, to 3.95 million barrels per day  the lowest level in over two decades, said Gary Peach, oil markets analyst at Energy Intelligence. 
“The outages are extraordinary,” he said. 
Gasoline production has fallen 17% to 850,000 barrels a day, from 1.03 million a day a year ago  far short of what’s needed for the domestic market. 
Russia exports relatively little gasoline. 
“Reportedly, there are good supplies of fuel around the country. 
The problem is it’s in the wrong place,” Peach said. 
Supplies need to be reallocated to regions experiencing shortages, and in a big country like Russia, “it’s not something that can be done overnight,” Weafer said. 
“There should be enough, but it will take several weeks to get it from where it is to where it’s needed,” he says. 
“It’s just a huge logistics operation to do that.” 
Fixing the war-damaged refineries is complicated. 
Ukraine’s attacks damaged specialized equipment that is often sourced abroad, making repairs time-consuming and expensive as workarounds or replacements are sought by evading sanctions. 
“They manage to get these things up and running, not necessarily at full capacity,” Peach said. 
“But the extent of the damage this time is so extensive that they won’t get back to winter levels of refining this summer.” 
Repairing the Moscow Oil Refinery, which supplied 40% of the fuel to the capital and the surrounding region, is expected to take at least three months, Weafer said. 
If there’s no further damage to Russia’s oil infrastructure, he estimated the shortages will last “probably throughout the summer” because demand from agriculture will likely remain high into September. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.3%Dasha Litvinova: 2.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias6.3%This article: 4.6%Dasha Litvinova: 1.3%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 10.7%Dasha Litvinova: 6.2%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.7%This article: 10.6%Dasha Litvinova: 2.8%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic10.6%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 1.2%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.8%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias1.0%This article: 19.7%Dasha Litvinova: 23.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect19.7%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Dasha Litvinova: 1.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.4%Dasha Litvinova: 2.8%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias14.4%This article: 13.2%Dasha Litvinova: 7.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias13.2%This article: 29.4%Dasha Litvinova: 23.1%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias29.4%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.4%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Dasha Litvinova: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 3.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.9%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.9%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.9%Dasha Litvinova: 11.5%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority27.9%This article: 4.6%Dasha Litvinova: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma4.6%This article: 3.8%Dasha Litvinova: 3.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.8%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.6%Dasha Litvinova: 6.4%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization12.6%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 4.7%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.6%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.8%Dasha Litvinova: 8.6%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.8%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 1.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.8%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.1%Dasha Litvinova: 2.4%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal7.1%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.4%Dasha Litvinova: 1.3%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.4%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.5%Dasha Litvinova: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading1.5%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.4%Dasha Litvinova: 1.3%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 6.3%Dasha Litvinova: 1.9%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.3%This article: 12.6%Dasha Litvinova: 2.3%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice12.6%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dasha Litvinova: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

605 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers45%attributed speech334writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 38 words • 100.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageGary Peach • 44 words • 0.0% coverageGary Peach • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGary Peach • 10 words • 100.0% coverageGary Peach • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWeafer • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWeafer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWeafer • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGary Peach • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGary Peach • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWeafer • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWeafer • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Vladimir Putin

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words17% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Quote-first Misdirection+80.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Vladimir Putin: 80.9%80.9%Biased Writer Voice-22.8 ptsWriter: 22.8%Vladimir Putin: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%Vladimir Putin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.