Topic summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos2,645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drone Attacks results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,808 hits. Analysis detected 9,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,861 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,241 of 15,766 topics). This Drone Attacks is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Drone Attacks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,861
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos