Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Refineries results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 5,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,250 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Refineries is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Oil Refineries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,800
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos